Problem: write the definition for this function without using any built-in functions. if pStr is null, return 0. if pStr contains non-numeric characters, either return 0 (ok) or return the number derived so far (better) (e.g. if its “123A”, then return 123). assume all numbers are positive. plus or minus signs can be considered non-numeric characters. in order to solve this program, the programmer must understand the difference between the integer 0 and the character ‘0’, and how converting ‘0’ to an int, will not result in 0. in other words, they have to understand what ascii is all about.
Solution
string manipulation functions are great programming questions. they test whether the user can understand and translate into code simple algorithms. string functions test pointer arithmetic which usually shows a knowledgeable programmer. also there are usually multiple solutions, some more efficient than others. plus people use them all the time so they should understand how they work. my favorite is atoi and i start the problem like this:
int atoi( char* pStr )
write the definition for this function without using any built-in functions. if pStr is null, return 0. if pStr contains non-numeric characters, either return 0 (ok) or return the number derived so far (better) (e.g. if its “123A”, then return 123). assume all numbers are positive. plus or minus signs can be considered non-numeric characters. in order to solve this program, the programmer must understand the difference between the integer 0 and the character ‘0’, and how converting ‘0’ to an int, will not result in 0. in other words, they have to understand what ascii is all about. if they are stuck solving this problem, just ask them first to write:
charToInt(char c)
if they can’t do that then they basically missed half the problem. any moderately talented programmer who has a CS degree knows how to convert a char to an int. (note i said convert, not cast. charToInt('9') should return 9.)
when they start to solve the problem you will notice that they must make a choice in how they will process the string - from left to right or right to left. i will discuss both methods and the difficulties encountered in each.
“right to left” - this method starts at the right hand letter of the string and converts that character to an int. it then stores this value after promoting it to its correct “tens” place.
int atoi( char* pStr )
{
int iRetVal = 0;
int iTens = 1;
if ( pStr )
{
char* pCur = pStr;
while (*pCur)
pCur++;
pCur--;
while ( pCur >= pStr && *pCur <= '9' && *pCur >= '0' )
{
iRetVal += ((*pCur - '0') * iTens);
pCur--;
iTens *= 10;
}
}
return iRetVal;
}
“left to right” - this method keeps adding the number and multiplying the result by ten before continuing to the next number. e.g. if you had “6234” and you processed from left to right you’d have 6, then if you kept reading you’d multiply your result by 10 (6*10) to add a zero for where the next number would go. 60, and then you’d slide the 2 into the zero place you just made. 62. do it again, 620, slide the next number in, 623.
int atoi( char* pStr )
{
int iRetVal = 0;
if ( pStr )
{
while ( *pStr && *pStr <= '9' && *pStr >= '0' )
{
iRetVal = (iRetVal * 10) + (*pStr - '0');
pStr++;
}
}
return iRetVal;
}
i think the “left to right” method is a little bit cleaner, or maybe its just cooler. but both are “correct”.
remember that debugging code on paper is somewhat hard. most programmers aren’t used to studying code that much when you can just hit F-7, compile and see if the compiler barfs or not. if you notice an error, just ask them to step through a sample string drawing out what is happening with all the variables and the pointers in every step. they should find their mistake then and fix it (no points deducted).
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
int atoi( char* pStr )
Bumblebee
problem: two trains enter a tunnel 200 miles long (yeah, its a big tunnel) travelling at 100 mph at the same time from opposite directions. as soon as they enter the tunnel a supersonic bee flying at 1000 mph starts from one train and heads toward the other one. as soon as it reaches the other one it turns around and heads back toward the first, going back and forth between the trains until the trains collide in a fiery explosion in the middle of the tunnel (the bee survives). how far did the bee travel?
Solution
solution: this puzzle falls pretty high on my aha scale. my first inclination when i heard it was to think “ok, so i just need to sum up the distances that the bee travels…” but then you quickly realize that its a difficult (not impossible) summation which the interviewer could hardly expect you to answer (unless i guess if you are looking for a job as a quant). “there must be a trick” you say. eh, sort of i guess, enough to say that this question is a stupid interview question.
the tunnel is 200 miles long. the trains meet in the middle travelling at 100 mph, so it takes them an hour to reach the middle. the bee is travelling 1000 mph for an hour (since its flying the whole time the trains are racing toward one another) - so basically the bee goes 1000 miles.
there is no process to explain, so this question can’t possibly teach you anything about the person. they either know it or they don’t and if they already knew it before you asked, you’re not going to be able to tell when they give you the answer. so don’t ask this question. and if someone asks you this question, just tell them you’ve already heard it before.
Solution
solution: this puzzle falls pretty high on my aha scale. my first inclination when i heard it was to think “ok, so i just need to sum up the distances that the bee travels…” but then you quickly realize that its a difficult (not impossible) summation which the interviewer could hardly expect you to answer (unless i guess if you are looking for a job as a quant). “there must be a trick” you say. eh, sort of i guess, enough to say that this question is a stupid interview question.
the tunnel is 200 miles long. the trains meet in the middle travelling at 100 mph, so it takes them an hour to reach the middle. the bee is travelling 1000 mph for an hour (since its flying the whole time the trains are racing toward one another) - so basically the bee goes 1000 miles.
there is no process to explain, so this question can’t possibly teach you anything about the person. they either know it or they don’t and if they already knew it before you asked, you’re not going to be able to tell when they give you the answer. so don’t ask this question. and if someone asks you this question, just tell them you’ve already heard it before.
Red Marbles, Blue Marbles
Problem: you have two jars, 50 red marbles, 50 blue marbles. you need to place all the marbles into the jars such that when you blindly pick one marble out of one jar, you maximize the chances that it will be red. (when picking, you’ll first randomly pick a jar, and then randomly pick a marble out of that jar) you can arrange the marbles however you like, but each marble must be in a jar.
Solution
Chance! chance is easy if you know how to do the formula. we know that we have two choices to make. first we’ll pick a jar, and each jar will have a 1/2 chance of being picked. then we’ll pick a marble, and depending how we stack the marbles, we’ll have a (# of red marbles in jar)/(# of total marbles in jar) chance of getting a red one.
for example, say we put all the red marbles into jar A and all the blue ones into jar B. then our chances for picking a red one are:
1/2 chance we pick jar A * 50/50 chance we pick a red marble
1/2 chance we pick jar B * 0/50 chance we pick a red marble
do the math and you get 1/2 chance for a red marble from jar A and a 0/2 chance for a red marble from jar B. add ‘em up and you get the result = 1/2 chance for picking a red marble.
think about it for awhile and see if you can figure out the right combination. we had a 50/50 (guaranteed) chance in picking a red marble from jar A, but we didn’t have to have 50 red marbles in there to guarantee those fantastic odds, did we? we could’ve just left 1 red marble in there and the odds are still 1/1. then we can take all those other marbles and throw them in jar B to help the odds out there.
let’s look at those chances:
1/2 we pick jar A * 1/1 we pick a red marble
1/2 we pick jar B * 49/99 we pick a red marble
do the math and add them up to get 1/2 + 49/198 = 148/198, which is almost 3/4.
we can prove these are the best odds in a somewhat non-formal way as follows. our goal is to maximize the odds of picking a red marble. therefore we can subdivide this goal into maximizing the odds of picking a red marble in jar A and maximizing the odds of picking a red marble in jar B. if we do that, then we will have achieved our goal. it is true that by placing more red marbles into a jar we will increase the chances of picking a red marble. it is also true that by reducing the number of blue marbles in a jar we will increase the odds also. we’ve maximized the odds in jar A since 1/1 is the maximum odds by reducing the number of blue marbles to 0 (the minimum). we’ve also maximized the number of red marbles in jar B. if we added any more red marbles to jar B we would have to take them out of jar A which reduce the odds there to 0 (very bad). if we took any more blue ones out of jar B we would have to put them in jar A which reduce the odds there by 50% (very bad).
it wasn’t really a good proof, but QED anyway :-P
Solution
Chance! chance is easy if you know how to do the formula. we know that we have two choices to make. first we’ll pick a jar, and each jar will have a 1/2 chance of being picked. then we’ll pick a marble, and depending how we stack the marbles, we’ll have a (# of red marbles in jar)/(# of total marbles in jar) chance of getting a red one.
for example, say we put all the red marbles into jar A and all the blue ones into jar B. then our chances for picking a red one are:
1/2 chance we pick jar A * 50/50 chance we pick a red marble
1/2 chance we pick jar B * 0/50 chance we pick a red marble
do the math and you get 1/2 chance for a red marble from jar A and a 0/2 chance for a red marble from jar B. add ‘em up and you get the result = 1/2 chance for picking a red marble.
think about it for awhile and see if you can figure out the right combination. we had a 50/50 (guaranteed) chance in picking a red marble from jar A, but we didn’t have to have 50 red marbles in there to guarantee those fantastic odds, did we? we could’ve just left 1 red marble in there and the odds are still 1/1. then we can take all those other marbles and throw them in jar B to help the odds out there.
let’s look at those chances:
1/2 we pick jar A * 1/1 we pick a red marble
1/2 we pick jar B * 49/99 we pick a red marble
do the math and add them up to get 1/2 + 49/198 = 148/198, which is almost 3/4.
we can prove these are the best odds in a somewhat non-formal way as follows. our goal is to maximize the odds of picking a red marble. therefore we can subdivide this goal into maximizing the odds of picking a red marble in jar A and maximizing the odds of picking a red marble in jar B. if we do that, then we will have achieved our goal. it is true that by placing more red marbles into a jar we will increase the chances of picking a red marble. it is also true that by reducing the number of blue marbles in a jar we will increase the odds also. we’ve maximized the odds in jar A since 1/1 is the maximum odds by reducing the number of blue marbles to 0 (the minimum). we’ve also maximized the number of red marbles in jar B. if we added any more red marbles to jar B we would have to take them out of jar A which reduce the odds there to 0 (very bad). if we took any more blue ones out of jar B we would have to put them in jar A which reduce the odds there by 50% (very bad).
it wasn’t really a good proof, but QED anyway :-P
100 Doors in a Row - Solution
Problem: you have 100 doors in a row that are all initially closed. you make 100 passes by the doors starting with the first door every time. the first time through you visit every door and toggle the door (if the door is closed, you open it, if its open, you close it). the second time you only visit every 2nd door (door #2, #4, #6). the third time, every 3rd door (door #3, #6, #9), etc, until you only visit the 100th door.
question: what state are the doors in after the last pass? which are open which are closed?
Solution
For example, after the first pass every door is open. on the second pass you only visit the even doors (2,4,6,8…) so now the even doors are closed and the odd ones are opened. the third time through you will close door 3 (opened from the first pass), open door 6 (closed from the second pass), etc..
question: what state are the doors in after the last pass? which are open which are closed?
solution: you can figure out that for any given door, say door #42, you will visit it for every divisor it has. so 42 has 1 & 42, 2 & 21, 3 & 14, 6 & 7. so on pass 1 i will open the door, pass 2 i will close it, pass 3 open, pass 6 close, pass 7 open, pass 14 close, pass 21 open, pass 42 close. for every pair of divisors the door will just end up back in its initial state. so you might think that every door will end up closed? well what about door #9. 9 has the divisors 1 & 9, 3 & 3. but 3 is repeated because 9 is a perfect square, so you will only visit door #9, on pass 1, 3, and 9… leaving it open at the end. only perfect square doors will be open at the end.
question: what state are the doors in after the last pass? which are open which are closed?
Solution
For example, after the first pass every door is open. on the second pass you only visit the even doors (2,4,6,8…) so now the even doors are closed and the odd ones are opened. the third time through you will close door 3 (opened from the first pass), open door 6 (closed from the second pass), etc..
question: what state are the doors in after the last pass? which are open which are closed?
solution: you can figure out that for any given door, say door #42, you will visit it for every divisor it has. so 42 has 1 & 42, 2 & 21, 3 & 14, 6 & 7. so on pass 1 i will open the door, pass 2 i will close it, pass 3 open, pass 6 close, pass 7 open, pass 14 close, pass 21 open, pass 42 close. for every pair of divisors the door will just end up back in its initial state. so you might think that every door will end up closed? well what about door #9. 9 has the divisors 1 & 9, 3 & 3. but 3 is repeated because 9 is a perfect square, so you will only visit door #9, on pass 1, 3, and 9… leaving it open at the end. only perfect square doors will be open at the end.
Reverse a String - Solution
Reverse a String
A typical programming interview question is “reverse a string, in place”. if you understand pointers, the solution is simple. even if you don’t, it can be accomplished using array indices. i usually ask candidates this question first, so they get the algorithm in their head. then i play dirty by asking them to reverse the string word by word, in place. for example if our string is “the house is blue”, the return value would be “blue is house the”. the words are reversed, but the letters are still in order (within the word).
Solution
Solving the initial problem of just reversing a string can either be a huge help or a frustrating hinderance. most likely the first attempt will be to solve it the same way, by swapping letters at the front of the string with letters at the back, and then adding some logic to keep the words in order. this attempt will lead to confusion pretty quickly.
for example, if we start by figuring out that “the” is 3 letters long and then try to put the “t” from “the” where the “l” from “blue” is, we encounter a problem. where do we put the “l” from “blue”? hmm… well we could have also figured out how long “blue” was and that would tell us where to put the “l” at… but the “e” from “blue” needs to go into the space after “the”. argh. its getting quite confusing. in fact, i would be delighted to even see a solution to this problem using this attack method. i don’t think its impossible, but i think it is so complex that it’s not worth pursuing.
here’s a hint. remember before when we just reversed “the house is blue”? what happened?
initial: the house is blue
reverse: eulb si esuoh eht
look at the result for a minute. notice anything? if you still don’t see it, try this.
initial: the house is blue
reverse: eulb si esuoh eht
wanted : blue is house the
the solution can be attained by first reversing the string normally, and then just reversing each word.
The Circular Lake Monster solution
For #1, how about row in a circle a bit smaller 1/4r in size. Since he won't be able to keep up with you, when he is on the opposite shore you can make a brake for it. You have r*3/4 to travel, but 4*3/4 is less then pi, so he won't be able to catch you in time
part 2: Assume x is the monster's speed. Then to get the circle trick to work, you row a circle a little less than 1/x of the radius, leaving you 1 - 1/x to row when he is opposite of you. If the monster can travel pi times the radius faster than you can travel the radius, you're hosed. In the time you travel 1 - 1/x, he'll travel x times that. Set that equal to pi, and you x * (1 - 1/x) = pi, which solves to x = pi + 1.
pi + 1 would be my guess for the speed that impossible to escape from, but I could be making an easy mistake.
part 2: Assume x is the monster's speed. Then to get the circle trick to work, you row a circle a little less than 1/x of the radius, leaving you 1 - 1/x to row when he is opposite of you. If the monster can travel pi times the radius faster than you can travel the radius, you're hosed. In the time you travel 1 - 1/x, he'll travel x times that. Set that equal to pi, and you x * (1 - 1/x) = pi, which solves to x = pi + 1.
pi + 1 would be my guess for the speed that impossible to escape from, but I could be making an easy mistake.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Array of 0 and 1, put 0's at even position and 1's at odd position
you are given an array of integers containing only 0s and 1s. you have to place all the 0s in even position and 1s in odd position and if suppose no if 0s exceed no. of 1s or vice versa then keep them untouched. Do that in ONE PASS and WITHOUT taking EXTRA MEMORY.
input array:
{0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 }
output array:
{0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 }
input array:
{0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 }
output array:
{0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 }
Thursday, May 15, 2008
Deleting … Approving …
This is similar to an implementation of partition method of quick sort.
oddInd==0;
evenInd=1;
while(true)
{
while(oddInd
if(oddInd>=strLen) break;
while(evenInd
if(evenInd>=strLen) break;
swap(str[evenInd], str[oddInd]);
}
Well, one more challenging version of this problem is to consider an array containing 0s,1s and 2s and do the same thing. This question was asked in one microsoft internship interview.
oddInd==0;
evenInd=1;
while(true)
{
while(oddInd
if(oddInd>=strLen) break;
while(evenInd
if(evenInd>=strLen) break;
swap(str[evenInd], str[oddInd]);
}
Well, one more challenging version of this problem is to consider an array containing 0s,1s and 2s and do the same thing. This question was asked in one microsoft internship interview.
Deleting … Approving …
OOPS!!! There was a big mistake in the above code.
This is similar to an implementation of partition method of quick sort.
oddInd==0;
evenInd=1;
while(true)
{
while(oddInd if(oddInd>=strLen) break;
while(evenInd if(evenInd>=strLen) break;
swap(str[evenInd], str[oddInd]);
}
Well, one more challenging version of this problem is to consider an array containing 0s,1s and 2s and do the same thing. This question was asked in one microsoft internship interview.
This is similar to an implementation of partition method of quick sort.
oddInd==0;
evenInd=1;
while(true)
{
while(oddInd
while(evenInd
swap(str[evenInd], str[oddInd]);
}
Well, one more challenging version of this problem is to consider an array containing 0s,1s and 2s and do the same thing. This question was asked in one microsoft internship interview.
Deleting … Approving …
Perish the thought that anyone should use extra memory!
BTW, the indexes into the array are extra memory.
Too many of these questions are isomorphic with:
"Oh, so you can type in your code? How about if we tie one arm behind your back? YANK! Still typing? How about if we keep hitting you with this baseball bat? Whack, whack, whack! Still at it, huh? Well, at least we got him down to 2 WPM."
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
BTW, the indexes into the array are extra memory.
Too many of these questions are isomorphic with:
"Oh, so you can type in your code? How about if we tie one arm behind your back? YANK! Still typing? How about if we keep hitting you with this baseball bat? Whack, whack, whack! Still at it, huh? Well, at least we got him down to 2 WPM."
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Deleting … Approving …
That seems to be what they mean when they say no extra memory. Heck making a function call allocates a frame on the stack so does that mean no function calls either?
I always took it to mean no building a data structure. Which can be a valid restriction if data is going to be changing often(high rebuild costs) or you have a truly large dataset. It can be hard to get a std::vector to hit 100mb if you already have a number of other 100mb chunks floating around.
I always took it to mean no building a data structure. Which can be a valid restriction if data is going to be changing often(high rebuild costs) or you have a truly large dataset. It can be hard to get a std::vector to hit 100mb if you already have a number of other 100mb chunks floating around.
soup
Friday, May 16, 2008
Friday, May 16, 2008
Deleting … Approving …
soup,
The usual complexity-theoretic definition of "no extra memory" is that the program can use a constant number of registers just large enough to index the input.
The usual complexity-theoretic definition of "no extra memory" is that the program can use a constant number of registers just large enough to index the input.
d
Friday, May 16, 2008
Friday, May 16, 2008
Deleting … Approving …
I tried JigSaw's solution in to java(http://pastebin.com/f41fe39d1). I might have mis-understood the code but the resulting array is
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
Deleting … Approving …
I think there is a problem in jigsaw's solution.His solution says:
oddInd==0;
evenInd=1;
while(true)
{
while(oddInd if(oddInd>=strLen) break;
while(evenInd if(evenInd>=strLen) break;
swap(str[evenInd], str[oddInd]);
}
First of all.it will produce an an arrangement of 10101010 type of string.But that can be solved by using str[oddInd]==0 and str[evenInd]==1. But more serious problem is if the array is such that it has even no. of elements and each even positions are correctly filled with 0s and there are some extra 0s in odd positions because in that case the first inner while loop executes and then the outer while loop terminates by break statement.
oddInd==0;
evenInd=1;
while(true)
{
while(oddInd
while(evenInd
swap(str[evenInd], str[oddInd]);
}
First of all.it will produce an an arrangement of 10101010 type of string.But that can be solved by using str[oddInd]==0 and str[evenInd]==1. But more serious problem is if the array is such that it has even no. of elements and each even positions are correctly filled with 0s and there are some extra 0s in odd positions because in that case the first inner while loop executes and then the outer while loop terminates by break statement.
Deleting … Approving …
@sagsriv
i guess the depend on understanding of "and if suppose no if 0s exceed no. of 1s or vice versa then keep them untouched"
e.g., input array:
{0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 }
output array should be:
a)
{0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 }
since in the question, it states
"if 0s exceed no. of 1s or vice versa then keep them untouched"
or
b)
{0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 }
to move "0s" to the end.which should can be also done in one pass.
which looks better..lol
i guess the depend on understanding of "and if suppose no if 0s exceed no. of 1s or vice versa then keep them untouched"
e.g., input array:
{0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 }
output array should be:
a)
{0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 }
since in the question, it states
"if 0s exceed no. of 1s or vice versa then keep them untouched"
or
b)
{0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 }
to move "0s" to the end.which should can be also done in one pass.
which looks better..lol
Deleting … Approving …
Add all the numbers in the array to get the sum. The sum equals to number of ONEs in the array? Then prepare the sequence of 0,1,0,1 ... based on the no. of ONEs using a simple for loop.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)